Monday, February 27, 2023

Mischevious Menageries - 1stDibs Introspective

Mischevious Menageries - 1stDibs Introspective

Mischevious Menageries

French sculptors Claude and François-Xavier Lalannes’s iconic flocks of sheep and rams grazed along Park Avenue in 2009; François-Xavier created his initial woolly herd in Paris in 1966, and Yves Saint Laurent was one of the first to collect them. Photo by Mark Markin

On a recent spring evening in New York, at PAUL KASMIN‘s two Chelsea galleries, CLAUDE LALANNE was New York’s number one “It” girl. The artist’s admirers spilled out of the Kasmin spaces, where an exhibition of her work and that of her late husband, FRANÇOIS-XAVIER, had just opened. She had double kisses for everyone: Bette Midler to the right, PETER MARINO to the left; Kenneth Jay Lane and Jean-Gabriel Mitterrand standing by to say hello. They warmly grasped the petite Lalanne, still lively at 88, who with François-Xavier created a whole new breed of sculpture — bronze, steel, stone and copper animals and plants that cheekily function as stools, furnaces, chairs, bars and even bathtubs.

Lauded when they first burst on the scene 60 years ago and in the decades since — their work was exhibited at the Art Institute of Chicago in 1967 and featured in Life in the 1970s — the Lalannes found themselves a bit out of style in the ’80s and ’90s. Galleries never stopped showing their work, however, and the couple enjoyed a renewed public embrace in the last few years, especially after 2009, when a lifelike herd of their epoxy-stone-and-bronze sheep grazed along Park Avenue, joined by one of François-Xavier’s massive bronze monkeys and one of Claude’s signature Choupattes — a copper-and-bronze cabbage, with chicken feet. A retrospective in Paris at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs followed in 2010.

The Lalannes have long been darlings of art, fashion and social types, from TOM FORD to VALENTINO, Jane Holzer to Beth Rudin DeWoody, COCO CHANEL to YVES SAINT LAURENT. YSL first met them in the mid-1950s, when they were working on window dressings for DIOR and he was a designer there, and he came to see the couple’s first joint gallery show, “Zoophites.”

Since 1967, Les Lalanne have made their home and studio on a farm outside Paris where such works as Francois-Xavier's bronze ITALSinge Avise (Trés Grand),ITAL 2008, live happily.

Since 1967, the Lalannes have made their home and studio on a farm outside Paris where such works as François-Xavier’s bronze Singe Avise (Trés Grand), 2008, live happily.

Including a veritable menagerie of whimsical creatures both real and chimerical, the couple’s art is never seriously self-important, but the Lalannes are serious artists nonetheless. They were both classically trained in Paris, he at the Académie Julian, she at the École Nationale Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs and the École des Beaux-Arts. When they met at François-Xavier’s first gallery show in 1953, he was pursuing drafting and painting while she had a passion for metalwork and architecture. They began collaborating in 1956, mostly on decorative projects — like those Dior window displays.

Saint Laurent would eventually go on to snap up entire flocks of the Lalannes’ now-famous woolly sheep, but the designer’s first commission was a sculptural bar for the Paris apartment he shared with Pierre Bergé. Delivered by François-Xavier in 1965, Bar YSL, as it came to be known, was a two-tiered, Space Agestyle tour-de-force, comprising an ovoid bottle rack, a drink shaker in the shape of a rhino horn, a spherical ice bucket and a crystal vase. (Leave it to a Frenchman to foresee a need for flowers gracing the bar.) The one-of-a-kind piece became the first of many Lalanne works Saint Laurent commissioned for his home, several of which made history half a century later when they sold at the 2009 Christie’s sale of his treasures. Bar YSL alone went for $3.5 million. (Another YSL commission, an installation of 15 mirrors set in frames of entwined bronze-and-copper hostas, took Claude 10 years to complete. Christie’s sold it for $2.39 million.)

As young artists, Claude and François-Xavier worked in a noted artists’ colony in Montparnasse. According to Paul Kasmin, WILLIAM COPLEY, the American painter and collector who had a studio there, “was very fond of François-Xavier. He was moving back to America and said, ‘You should take my studio.’” The Lalannes moved in amidst the best of neighbors, many of whom were also friends — Constantin Brancusi, MAX ERNSTLARRY RIVERSJEAN TINGUELy, James Metcalf, NIKI DE SAINT PHALLE.


“THE WORK WAS SURREAL, EDGY, BEAUTIFUL IN A PERSONAL WAY.”
– Peter Marino


The haughty bronze Caprin, 2011, in an edition of eight, is attributed to both artists, is on view at Paul Kasmin.

Only Francois-Xavier could imagine a bronze gorilla as a safe, and his baboon cousin as a cast-iron fireplace, both part of an edition of eight at Paul Kasmin.

Only François-Xavier could imagine a bronze gorilla as a safe, and his baboon cousin as a cast-iron fireplace, both part of an edition of eight at Paul Kasmin.

While the couple worked together constantly over the years and, indeed, signed many of their joint works simply “LES LALANNES,” they also each developed their own individual styles: François-Xavier worked with grand, simple forms, inspired, art critics say, by a postwar job as a security guard in the Egyptian room at the Louvre; Claude found her muse in the leaves and flowers from her garden, developing organic shapes that she cast in galvanized metals. “My whole life I was inspired by nothing but nature,” she says.

As seen in the current Kasmin show, François-Xavier tended to work large, with a pet passion for monkeys and baboons — though Claude says she prefers his ostriches. Claude can go big or small, favoring crocodiles that, at Kasmin, make their way into leather-seated banquettes and consoles (so-called “Crococonsoles”). The most touching object on display, though, is a tiny childlike drawing that François-Xavier did of his wife sitting on a crocodile. At Kasmin, the drawing hangs on a wall opposite the life-size piece that it inspired. “Crocodiles scare me,” Claude says, explaining her endless fascination with the reptiles.

Among Claude’s more small-scaled oeuvre is cutlery that crawls with forest plants and crustaceans; her first such commission was a 1965 set for SALVADOR DALÌ. Paul Kasmin’s shop is selling an open edition of her Petite Escargot café spoon. “They make very posh baby gifts,” says the gallery’s Polina Berlin.

New York's Maison Gerard offers Claude's hand-chased bronze candleholder and honeysuckle candle

New York’s Maison Gerard offers Claude’s hand-chased bronze candleholder and honeysuckle candle.

In March, husband-and-wife gallerists Ben Brown and Louisa Guinness, who represent the Lalannes in London — he the art and she Claude’s floral brooches, bracelets and earrings — brought the Lalannes’ work to the European Fine Art Fair (TEFAF), in Maastricht, Holland, for the fourth year running. There, they offered a stunning 1984 Sèvres tea service that Claude transformed with leaves and butterflies of galvanized copper. The artist says now that this is her favorite project out of her entire body of work. (Brown will be mounting a major Lalanne exhibition next June.)

With her dear friend Sandrine Pozzo di Borgo, a third-generation Paris parfumier, Claude has more recently created her most fragrant work to date — a large honeysuckle candle that sits in a holder of sculpted flora and fauna inspired by her voluminous garden. Sold through MAISON GERARD, in New York, the hand-finished bronze holder functions as a vase after the candle burns down. (All profits from their sale go to charity.)

Today, dealers will tell you that the market for the Lalannes’ work is truly global, with collectors in Hong Kong and the Philippines as well as America and Europe. “It’s a far cry from when their work fell out of fashion in the 1980s and ’90s,” says Benoist Drut of Maison Gerard. “It really was Peter Marino who brought them back. He defended them and commissioned them right and left for himself and his clients.”

Marino, a noted international architect and collector, remembers his first encounter with a work by the Lalannes. “It was in the 1970s, at Iolas in New York. The work was surreal, edgy and beautiful in a personal way,” he says. He promptly bought a pair of crocodile armchairs. Today Marino has more than 40 Lalannes, many installed by the artists throughout the gardens of his Hamptons home.

Claude studied metalworking and architecture

Claude, here seen with one of her signature Choupattes — a copper-and-bronze chicken-footed cabbage — studied metalworking and architecture.

Coach creative director and president REED KRAKOFF is another keen Lalanne collector. “I first saw their work 20 years ago in a picture of Yves Saint Laurent in his garden surrounded by a bunch of woolly sheep,” says Krakoff. “I then started collecting their work with my wife, Delphine.”

Krakoff worked with Kasmin and Brown to co-sponsor the couple’s first New York exhibition in 20 years. It opened in 2006 and traveled to London in 2007, a year before François-Xavier’s death. These days, Claude works an hour south of Paris, at a metalsmithing compound on an old farm in Ury, near Fontainebleau, where the couple moved in 1967. It remains abuzz with artisans, plus Doudou and Diva, Claude’s big white Swiss shepherd and harlequin dachshund, and occasional children and grandchildren.

Kasmin photographed the complex over the course of his many visits — he goes every three months or so — and has now published the images in CLAUDE & FRANCOIS-XAVIER LALANNE: ART.WORK.LIFE. (Rizzoli). “They work every single day,” he says, “from early morning to midday, when they break for a proper lunch of Claude’s old-fashioned French cooking. I know of no other studio quite like it.”

Kasmin reports that Claude continues the ambitious creative output that had been the couple’s way of life. “Some days they work very late,” he says. “She’s amazing — warm, extremely energetic and, as you can see in her work, quite mischievous.”

Sunday, February 26, 2023

The Chinese Century Is Already Over by Yi Fuxian - Project Syndicate

The Chinese Century Is Already Over by Yi Fuxian - Project Syndicate



The Chinese Century Is Already Over

Chinese leaders have long staked their policies on the assumption of a rising East and declining West, but China is already past its prime. The gap between its declining demographic and economic strength and its expanding strategic ambitions now constitutes a major geopolitical risk.



Saturday, February 25, 2023

Market Monitor: Feb. 25, 2023 - Origin Investments

Market Monitor: Feb. 25, 2023 - Origin Investments

Market Monitor: Feb. 25, 2023

Topic:  • By Origin Investments • February 24, 2023  Views


The Great Special Transfer

Tom Briney, National Head of Debt Investments

One of the more interesting pieces of news in the past couple of weeks is a move by Blackstone Inc. to transfer a loan, collateralized by one of its New York City portfolios, into special servicing. The $270.3 million loan is structured as a commercial mortgage-backed securities pool and collateralized by 11 properties throughout Manhattan. The underlying collateral appears to be performing well, with net operating income (NOI) increasing roughly 25% over the past two years, a healthy performance by any standard. So, what does it mean to transfer to special servicing, and why is such a large portfolio, of seemingly healthy assets, in that space? 

When a loan is performing as designed, the borrower pays monthly principal and interest payments, the lender receives those payments, and a master servicer handles the monthly transactions. Other than accounting for these payments and monitoring the health of the loan, the master servicer’s role is quite limited. If a loan is not performing as expected or there is an expectation that the loan will not continue to perform as expected, it is transferred to special servicing—a sort of loan purgatory. The special servicer has more latitude to work with the borrower and the lender to either get the loan to perform as planned or be foreclosed upon.   

The real estate in the Blackstone loan pool had been financed with a floating rate structure, with SOFR as the index benchmark. The interest rate on the loan has risen so rapidly that the 25% increase in NOI since 2020 can’t keep up with the increasing loan payments. Blackstone is not alone in its exposure to rising interest rates. In 2009, the absolute peak of stress during the Great Recession, 207 multifamily loans were transferred to special servicing; the all-time low of 35 occurred in 2018. Since then, the number of loans moving to loan purgatory—a leading indicator of distress—has been climbing steadily. Last year, 134 multifamily loans moved to special servicing, only 35% below the peak in 2009.   

Hundreds of billions of dollars in new floating rate multifamily loan originations are completed annually in the United States, slightly less than half of which are structured with floating interest rates. It’s nearly impossible to know how many aren’t hedged against rapid interest rate increases. But it’s safe to say there will be many more instances of interest rates outpacing NOI, and borrowers being forced to transfer their loans into special servicing. If interest rates remain high, the problem will accelerate due not only to rising interest rates but also slowing NOI growth. This is the beginning of the “Great Special Transfer,” and I won’t be surprised if we see the number of assets transferred into special servicing exceeding the 2009 peak, though I hope I am wrong!  

CMBS Multifamily Loans Transferred to Special Servicing

CMBS MF Loans Transferred

Source: Bloomberg

Note: This chart represents loans that were previously part of a publicly traded commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS) pool. Substantially more loans were held by private institutions, such as banks and life insurance companies; they are not included in the chart.  


A Deep Dive into Material Prices

Kevin Miller, Vice President of Development

As Market Monitor observed in November, construction prices declined in Q4 2022. So far this year, pricing has remained relatively flat, and we have wondered: Is this just a lag in the market as construction starts have slowed, or will construction pricing remain at this more elevated level?  

Three components factor into subcontractor pricing: labor, materials and equipment. Each makes up from 20% to 45% of the total direct construction budget. This week, we’re zeroing in on construction material prices. According to the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Construction Materials Producer Price Index, the highest percentage year-over-year increase in construction materials in the index’s 75-year history was in 2021—a 27% increase over 2020. And 2022 was third highest, increasing 12.5% over 2021.   

While the aggregate impact of those two years is staggering to contemplate, one can simply recall the headlines to remember why. High demand and low labor availability due to COVID-related restrictions, along with the war in Ukraine and an aging blue-collar workforce, drove historically high commodity and transportation prices.  

Starting in mid-2022, residential homebuilder demand began to fall, China reversed its zero-COVID policy, and backlogs at ports cleared up, among other factors. We saw the impact quickly in several leading indicators: Lumber futures plummeted from near-historic highs of $1,250 per thousand board feet to their current $400 to $500. Global shipping rates, as measured by the Freightos Baltic Index (FBX), fell to $2,000 per 40-foot containers from $8,500. And the S&P Global Commodities Index (SPGSCI) fell from a five-year high of $853 to around $575 to $600. Starting in June 2022, month-over-month material pricing turned negative and stayed that way into January. 

These factors helped blunt the impact of rising interest rates on new developments. What can we expect for the rest of 2023?  

Before the pandemic, lumber futures traded at a five-year average of about $350; global shipping rates were about $1,400; and the SPGSCI traded between $290 and $485 for the five years leading up to 2020. The pre-pandemic five-, 10- and 20-year average annual growth rates for the FRED Construction Materials PPI were 2.32%, 2.11% and 2.53%, respectively. Today’s construction material prices are about 25% higher than pre-pandemic pricing trends would suggest. However, looking back over the history of the FRED Construction Materials PPI, we rarely—apart from the Great Recession—see steep decreases in pricing after sharp increases. More typically, we see a new benchmark, followed by prolonged periods of flat to slightly negative price changes, before the next run-up in demand.    

It’s fair to expect construction material pricing to face downward pressure through 2023, but it also seems that it would take a dramatic demand shock to bring construction material prices back in line with pre-pandemic pricing norms. While pricing stability creates more predictability, it is only part of a development environment that includes falling rents and elevated interest rates. Even a decline in construction prices probably will not be enough to keep the pace of construction starts in line with the past two years.  

Producer Price Index by Commodity: Construction Materials

Producer Price Index

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via St. Louis Federal Reserve

In Pictures: See Every Single Artwork in the Rijksmuseum’s Vermeer Show, a Once-in-a-Lifetime Exhibition That Is Already Sold Out

In Pictures: See Every Single Artwork in the Rijksmuseum’s Vermeer Show, a Once-in-a-Lifetime Exhibition That Is Already Sold Out

Friday, February 24, 2023

Watch out, Xi and Putin — the world is a ‘hostile environment for autocrats’ - btbirkett@gmail.com - Gmail

Watch out, Xi and Putin — the world is a ‘hostile environment for autocrats’ - btbirkett@gmail.com - Gmail

THE CONVERSATION

Ken Roth poses for a photo.

Ken Roth, then-executive director of Human Rights Watch, poses for a photo on Jan. 16, 2019. | Markus Schreiber/AP Photo

Ken Roth retired in August after almost 30 years as the executive director of Human Rights Watch. In those three decades, Roth turned HRW from a 20-person group called Helsinki Watch focused on freeing dissidents in the former Soviet Union to a global organization with more than 500 staff working on some 100 countries.

Roth helped develop and refine HRW’s methodology of legal-standard human rights research backed by a global network of advocates that name, shame and demand change from government’s implicated in human rights abuses. In the process Roth became an inexhaustible marketer of the HRW brand who would rub elbows with world leaders at Davos on one day and get sanctioned by the Chinese government on the next.

But Roth’s tenure at HRW wasn’t without controversy. The organization admitted in 2020 that under Roth’s watch it had accepted a donation on the explicit condition that the funds not be used to support HRW’s work on LGBT rights in North Africa and the Middle East. HRW later returned that donation and implemented a policy that explicitly forbids such conditions on donor contributions, but the credibility damage was done. Roth also made headlines in January when the Harvard Kennedy School withdrew a fellowship it had offered him at the Carr Center for Human Rights. While Harvard gave no reason for that move, Roth suspected it was a reprisal for HRW’s outspoken criticism of Israel’s human rights record. Roth launched a high profile media campaign decrying Harvard’s decision, prompting the school to reverse course later that month.

I spoke with Roth about his role in the rise of the global human rights movement. In that conversation Roth shared how his own family’s narrow escape from authoritarian terror steered him into a career defined by facing down dictators and fighting to bring them to account.

The following interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

Who’s winning in this battle of autocracies like China and Russia against democracies and what the Biden administration calls the “rules-based international order”?

The common wisdom is that autocracy is in the ascendancy and democracy is in decline. And that is just not where we are right now. So many autocrats are illustrating the danger of being surrounded by sycophants, stifling debate and insisting on making all decisions yourself. That's how you get [Russian President] Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, [Chinese paramount leader] Xi Jinping’s zero-Covid policy, followed by zero preparation for post-Covid or [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan’s amnesties for construction-code violators even in earthquake zones.

So people are seeing through the supposed benefits of autocracy. The old view that our democracy is too slow and divisive and messy ignores the fact that democracies allow public debate and are able to correct policy errors more effectively than autocracy. Which is why we've seen this outpouring of popular support for democracy in so many countries around the world. If you put yourself in the shoes of an autocratic, it's a hostile environment.

You’ve met a lot of abusive authoritarians over the decades. Any stand- out encounters?

I met with Joseph Kabila, who was President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, three different times. But in the last meeting I had with him he was refusing to step down even though he was term limited. And he was super corrupt and increasingly repressive: There were protests against his staying in power and his police forces were shooting the protesters. So I said, “Mr. President, I see two paths before you. You can accept a transition, allow an election to take place and be the first Congolese leader to oversee a democratic transition. You will be a respected figure, you'll be sent on African Union missions, you will retire as one of the founders of Congolese democracy. Or you can continue sliding into a forever presidency. And there'll be protests and you'll keep shooting the protesters, and things will get more and more ugly. You're probably going to be forced from power. And at that point, you're going to face the real likelihood of prosecution.”

I remember him saying “Don't assume anything.” By which he meant, don't assume that I'm going to hang on forever. He ended the meeting by saying, “Pray for me.” And he ultimately did agree to step down. I can't take credit for this; I was one of many people pushing, but he stepped down.

It was an example that somebody who was very corrupt, quite repressive — it was possible to push them in a positive direction.

You started your career as a lawyer and a federal prosecutor — what were you thinking?

I thought of law as a route to political activism. It didn't start off very auspiciously, because I signed up for the one human rights course offered by Yale every year and each year, they canceled it. So, to this day, I've never taken a human rights course.

But what I did for Human Rights Watch has many parallels to what I did when I was a courtroom lawyer. You have to investigate and present the facts in the most compelling way you can, applying the law to those facts and persuading somebody to judge them. In the case of domestic litigation, it's all within the confines of the courtroom. And for human rights, it's within the global public domain — public opinion and government officials.

What does the controversy over your Harvard fellowship say about the career risks of challenging Israel's human rights record?

I'm actually quite worried about it. I had the visibility to make a stink in the media. And so the Kennedy School team reversed itself. But most scholars and most students don't have comparable visibility and there is broad fear that if you criticize Israel, you put your career in jeopardy. And that needs to be addressed.

How did Human Rights Watch change in your 30-odd years there?

It was much smaller than when I started – I think there were 20 staff. It was tiny.

The other huge change has been the change in communications technology. When I started, international phone calls were expensive. International travel was expensive and done rarely. And you literally wrote letters to people. Even investigations involved letter writing to government officials. When the fax machine emerged it was this major technological revolution because it enabled you to send an entire piece of paper worth of information for the cost of a quick international phone call. And that was huge. We would smuggle fax machines behind the Iron Curtain.

And when email emerged, that just changed everything because it enabled, for example, the global NGO campaign to ban landmines to communicate with colleagues around the world. But it also changed the metabolism of human rights efforts because until email, human rights reports were pretty much retrospective. And email enabled real-time reporting for the first time so that we could record a serious abuse today and try to stop it from occurring tomorrow. And that really changed the enterprise.

Speaking of technology, you’re a prolific Twitter user with a huge following. What do you think of Elon Musk and how he's running Twitter?

 It's an odd convention – why should this platform with 280 characters per tweet turn into a dominant form of political discourse? For whatever reason Twitter is where every journalist, every politician, every official has a presence and there's no substitute. So when people say, ‘Well, I'm going to delete my Twitter account and join Mastodon,’ they're out of their minds. Mastadon isn’t where it's happening. It's happening on Twitter.

You may not like the direction Elon Musk is taking it, but there's just no substitute for it. I find Twitter very useful for getting the word out to the people who matter for policy conversations. And also for shaping an informed public opinion. People who care about these issues tend to look to Twitter, for both knowledge and the latest developments, but also guidance about what they should do about it.

Your father escaped to America from Nazi Germany. How has that shaped who you are and what you do?

I grew up with Hitler stories. My father used to cut the hair of me and my brothers and to keep us quiet while he was cutting our hair, he would tell us stories about Germany. When we were little, he would tell us funny stories about the horse who would deliver meat from my grandfather's butcher shop. But then as we got slightly older, he would tell stories about what it was like being a young Jewish boy being moved into a Jewish school —being fearful of being arrested for some violation or having his father arrested.You’ve met a lot of abusive authoritarians over the decades. Any stand- out encounters?

I met with Joseph Kabila, who was President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, three different times. But in the last meeting I had with him he was refusing to step down even though he was term limited. And he was super corrupt and increasingly repressive: There were protests against his staying in power and his police forces were shooting the protesters. So I said, “Mr. President, I see two paths before you. You can accept a transition, allow an election to take place and be the first Congolese leader to oversee a democratic transition. You will be a respected figure, you'll be sent on African Union missions, you will retire as one of the founders of Congolese democracy. Or you can continue sliding into a forever presidency. And there'll be protests and you'll keep shooting the protesters, and things will get more and more ugly. You're probably going to be forced from power. And at that point, you're going to face the real likelihood of prosecution.”

I remember him saying “Don't assume anything.” By which he meant, don't assume that I'm going to hang on forever. He ended the meeting by saying, “Pray for me.” And he ultimately did agree to step down. I can't take credit for this; I was one of many people pushing, but he stepped down.

It was an example that somebody who was very corrupt, quite repressive — it was possible to push them in a positive direction.

You started your career as a lawyer and a federal prosecutor — what were you thinking?

I thought of law as a route to political activism. It didn't start off very auspiciously, because I signed up for the one human rights course offered by Yale every year and each year, they canceled it. So, to this day, I've never taken a human rights course.

But what I did for Human Rights Watch has many parallels to what I did when I was a courtroom lawyer. You have to investigate and present the facts in the most compelling way you can, applying the law to those facts and persuading somebody to judge them. In the case of domestic litigation, it's all within the confines of the courtroom. And for human rights, it's within the global public domain — public opinion and government officials.

What does the controversy over your Harvard fellowship say about the career risks of challenging Israel's human rights record?

I'm actually quite worried about it. I had the visibility to make a stink in the media. And so the Kennedy School team reversed itself. But most scholars and most students don't have comparable visibility and there is broad fear that if you criticize Israel, you put your career in jeopardy. And that needs to be addressed.

How did Human Rights Watch change in your 30-odd years there?

It was much smaller than when I started – I think there were 20 staff. It was tiny.

The other huge change has been the change in communications technology. When I started, international phone calls were expensive. International travel was expensive and done rarely. And you literally wrote letters to people. Even investigations involved letter writing to government officials. When the fax machine emerged it was this major technological revolution because it enabled you to send an entire piece of paper worth of information for the cost of a quick international phone call. And that was huge. We would smuggle fax machines behind the Iron Curtain.

And when email emerged, that just changed everything because it enabled, for example, the global NGO campaign to ban landmines to communicate with colleagues around the world. But it also changed the metabolism of human rights efforts because until email, human rights reports were pretty much retrospective. And email enabled real-time reporting for the first time so that we could record a serious abuse today and try to stop it from occurring tomorrow. And that really changed the enterprise.

Speaking of technology, you’re a prolific Twitter user with a huge following. What do you think of Elon Musk and how he's running Twitter?

 It's an odd convention – why should this platform with 280 characters per tweet turn into a dominant form of political discourse? For whatever reason Twitter is where every journalist, every politician, every official has a presence and there's no substitute. So when people say, ‘Well, I'm going to delete my Twitter account and join Mastodon,’ they're out of their minds. Mastadon isn’t where it's happening. It's happening on Twitter.

You may not like the direction Elon Musk is taking it, but there's just no substitute for it. I find Twitter very useful for getting the word out to the people who matter for policy conversations. And also for shaping an informed public opinion. People who care about these issues tend to look to Twitter, for both knowledge and the latest developments, but also guidance about what they should do about it.

Your father escaped to America from Nazi Germany. How has that shaped who you are and what you do?

I grew up with Hitler stories. My father used to cut the hair of me and my brothers and to keep us quiet while he was cutting our hair, he would tell us stories about Germany. When we were little, he would tell us funny stories about the horse who would deliver meat from my grandfather's butcher shop. But then as we got slightly older, he would tell stories about what it was like being a young Jewish boy being moved into a Jewish school —being fearful of being arrested for some violation or having his father arrested.

So I grew up very aware of the evil that governments can do. And I think that's a big part of what pushed me in the rights direction and toward international work.

How did your parents feel about your career choice?

At first, they thought I was crazy not to go to some big law firm. When I instead went to this obscure little human rights organization that no one had ever heard of, they thought I was out of my mind. And it took a few years until they began to see how respectfully Human Rights Watch was treated in the media and how I was treated and then they actually got into it.

My father died just two years ago, and I was able to spend his last two weeks with him. And one of the very sweet things he did was he had this group of friends we called the Romeos. Romeo stands for “retired old men eating out.” And he wanted me to meet with his Romeo group, to talk about my work and Human Rights Watch. And this was in the last week of his life and so he was very proud of it in the end, which was nice.

Thanks to editor Heidi Vogt and producer Andrew Howard.