(….Continued from Part One)
There are other hints that NHI (what Congress now formally calls Non-Human Intelligence) is in play, such as the many reports of electronics behaving oddly wherever these “drones” appear. As a former manufacturer of drones, I know it’s usually the other way around. Drones are affected by external electronics more than they create external electronic reactions. UAPs, in contrast, are rather famous for making lights and electronics go on and off and for interfering with radio waves.
This new “Patriot Drones” strategy also neatly deals with the tricky problem of wreckage. The US proudly showed the wreckage of the Chinese balloon last year but then said nothing about the wreckage from the other three Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs) that showed up that same week. Just recently, reports began to appear again that wreckage from one of these shoot downs was recently discovered from last year’s anomalous craft incidents. This means there’s a need to explain that. This new strategy is easier. Flood the sky with diverse, brightly lit drones, and nobody will be able to tell a UAP from a man-made drone. If you have to shoot it down, few humans would detect that a shootdown had even occurred. Voila. Problem solved. Boys in engineering, could you make our government drones look a lot more alien devices going forward please? That will confuse everybody even more, thanks. It’s clever, eh?
So, why is the idea that these things involve NHI so terrifying? The real key to the lights in the sky problem has been found at the bottom of that swamp that President Trump and his team seem so intent on cleaning up. There is a dark secret at the bottom of the swamp. Eric Weinstein suspected it. But, recently Marc Andreesen stumbled headlong into it. As he explains here, we have had a government that has been actively assassinating startups and classifying technologies, perhaps from Non-Human Origin, to keep the information and capabilities out of the public domain. Yes, Andreesen says the US Government and, by implication, other allied governments, have been effectively killing tech startups in the cradle. Andreessen says he was definitively told that only a few startups would be allowed to survive in any given technology, whether AI or fusion or anything else, and only if they agree to be controlled by the government. This isn’t exactly what they teach at Harvard Business School. It’s not just bad industrial policy. It’s anti-competitive, and, frankly, it’s ...
No comments:
Post a Comment